There are two big truths about business meetings that almost every businessman will agree with: we have too many meetings, and definitely not enough effective meetings. This here is the most common sentence uttered by business professionals of various profiles and employees of various organisations at the beginning of my education “How to constructively lead a meeting and participate in it”.
For years, research has also indicated that we set and hold too many meetings that do not result in the desired effects, but only in an excessive amount of time invested, and often in agreements of insufficient quality or in the failure to reach an agreement and in the frustrations of the meeting participants. Over time, bad meetings become our norm, we get used to them and do not try to influence them so as to improve and change them.
But in times of crisis, such as the one caused by the Covid-19 pandemic last year, and due to which most organisations had to switch to a predominantly virtual way of communicating and holding meetings, it was as if someone shone a spotlight on all the shortcomings of meetings. A large number of business professionals were continuously forced to be present in virtual meetings from sunup to sundown, and in some cases the practice of virtual meetings led to the so-called burn out syndrome. As a result of high levels of stress, high expectations, physical and emotional exhaustion, and feelings of ineffectiveness and lack of achievement, those who succumbed to this syndrome could no longer perform their work tasks effectively.
Effectiveness of virtual meetings during the Covid-19 pandemic:
-
- 55 percent of respondents are doing “something else” during a virtual meeting (Intercall research);
- 90 percent of respondents said they are significantly more distracted when working from home (Forbes, 2020).
-
- it is unfamiliar what the meeting’s purpose is/what it should achieve;
- participants do not know what is expected of them and why they are present in the first place and do not know how to participate;
- the agenda of the meeting is not sent in advance or it does not exist at all;
- no one moderates the meeting;
- there are too many digressions outside the agreed topic and/or too many distractions (phones, laptops, people entering/exiting, multitasking) during the meeting;
- one person dominates the meeting or everyone speaks and no one listens;
- the meeting is taking too long;
- it is unclear what the next steps are and which actions need to be taken, who must take them and by when;
- no agreement was reached, nothing was decided and the meeting did not result in any change.
-
- One or more people dominate the meeting.
- No one is moderating the meeting.
- At the meeting, information that is conveyed that can be communicated just as effectively by e-mail, and important matters are not discussed.
- No one is paying attention because everyone is on their cell phones or laptops.
- The same thing is discussed at every meeting because nothing gets done in between meetings.
